Forum Groups
  All forums
    Help & Feedback
      Questions
      Work in progress
      Finished Art
      Non-Max related
    Community
      Offtopic
      News
    Hardware
    Photography


Featured Threads
  inspiration alert!!!
(37 replies)
  Indespensible MaxScripts, Plugins and 3rd Party Tools
(37 replies)
  The allmighty FREE Resources Thread !
(17 replies)
  spam alert!!!
(4886 replies)
  Maxforums member photo gallery index
(114 replies)
  Maxforums Member Tutorials
(89 replies)
  three cheers to maxforums...
(240 replies)
  101 Things you didnt know in Max...
(198 replies)
  A Face tutorial from MDB101 :D
(95 replies)
  Maxforums.org Members Gallery
(516 replies)
  SON OF POST YOURSELF
(637 replies)
  Dub's Maxscript Tutorial Index
(119 replies)

Maxunderground news unavailable

Making highly detailed carpet...hmmm
show user profile  adammichell
Hey guys

I've been asked to make a close up image similar to this. He wants to show the difference in quality between his car mats and the competitions.

I've been playing around with Vray fur and mixture of displacement maps, but I just don't feel like I'm getting anywhere near the super fine details in the picture. I'm tempted to suggest that CG isn't the best way of illustrating his idea....unless anyone has any ideas ;)

Cheers

Adam

read 355 times
2/21/2012 12:42:17 PM (last edit: 2/21/2012 12:42:17 PM)
show user profile  Dr. Jim
You guys ever wonder why sometimes clients ask for things in CGI which would actually be faster and cheaper to do practically?


Had a client the other week talking about a 3 ft tall % symbol,....tracked to a car for some shots,.....but THEN 1 shot where 2 kids where kind of playing tug of war with it.

I'm like dude: Seriously? Do all that in 3D? the compositing and matching involved? You could do it for alot less to simply have a propmaker make the damn ting and shoot the kids playing tug of war with it.....lol...
read 337 times
2/21/2012 1:49:01 PM (last edit: 2/21/2012 1:50:55 PM)
show user profile  Nik Clark
I would choose to take the photo every time for this and forget the CG.



read 322 times
2/21/2012 2:59:10 PM (last edit: 2/21/2012 2:59:10 PM)
show user profile  STRAT
yup, photograph it and pass it off as your render :)





SJLEWORTHY.COM











read 319 times
2/21/2012 3:05:41 PM (last edit: 2/21/2012 3:05:41 PM)
show user profile  Mr.Burns
Very good, Strat :)
read 313 times
2/21/2012 3:11:16 PM (last edit: 2/21/2012 3:11:16 PM)
show user profile  LionDebt
Ahaa, so that's how Strat makes his bathrooms and kitchens look so damn good... Yo, Strat, you got a number of a tiler or a plumber I can use? ;)
read 310 times
2/21/2012 3:16:21 PM (last edit: 2/21/2012 3:16:21 PM)
show user profile  jareu
its because have the theory that because computers can do anything these days you just have to know how to tell the computer what to do and thats what he's paying you for. Like you're supposed to just press a big 'render carpet' button and it will do everything for you.

I agree, way too much time involved for getting a realistic standard to represent a difference in product. Will result in either your time down the drain and being underpaid, or a whopping big invoice and bitter feeling.

if his budget is big enough, rent a camera and a couple of lights for a day, make markup on the rental price. if it's not, use your own or a friend's camera and improvise a lighting setup. either way,
Taking a photo is the best way...

If he insists on CG, add a vignette and a filter and insist that its a render



He who says it cannot be done is interrupting the man doing it.

read 280 times
2/22/2012 12:52:16 AM (last edit: 2/22/2012 12:52:16 AM)
show user profile  donvella
What they said... or keep working on that displacement, you can get very very nice displacement, play with the settings.



read 272 times
2/22/2012 1:22:25 AM (last edit: 2/22/2012 1:22:25 AM)
#Maxforums IRC
Open chat window


Support Maxforums.org